Arcane WIzard wrote:CompWiz wrote:Read: computer hardware related stuff. Like computer components. Need prices for cpu's or graphics cards? I know the street prices off of the top of my head. Want to know which graphics card is faster? I've memorized the performance on quite a few of them. Want to know what's a good price for a certain hard drive? I'll tell you in a second. Hardware related stuff. Not backup programs.
Hey, why aren't international use of network architectures, their support, and use on that list? Oh right, you only think you know about hardware, because you know a couple of prices (that where at least twice as high as actually currently reasonable prices, but whatever)
They were? The hard drive prices I listed were:
400gb Seagate Barraccuda SATA II 7200.10 hard drive for $84, shipped(and that's new, not refurbished). That's a bad price? I challenge you to find a better price on that hard drive. Or any current 400gb SATA II hard drive with NCQ and 16mb of cache.
Fantom Drives G-Force MegaDisk 1.0TB 7200RPM USB 2.0 external hard drive for $650.00. However, according to you, this terabyte hard drive I listed didn't exist, or at least not in a store I could get to. Seeing as how it did very much exist, and was very much available for me to buy(If I felt like wasting a bunch of money), you obviously are not very good at judging prices for large hard drives. If you think that they don't exist, you quite apparently don't know prices for them. Same logic applies to the CFI External Enclosure 2TB hard drive for $1,099.00.
What hard drive did you think that I listed for an unreasonable price? If you're talking about the 200gb hard drive that you commented was a very high price, that wasn't me. In fact, when I replied to something that you said in that post, you very readily pointed out that you were not talking to me. You were talking to the person who posted the ridiculous hard drive price.
I'd like to know what you mean. What hard drive are you referring to?
Arcane WIzard wrote:
and read what some internet nerds had to say about a couple of videocards. And we all know if it's on the internet then it must be true. Right?
I read up on hardware reviews on multiple sites, and not just videocards. I keep track of current hard drive benchmarks, cpu benchmarks, some motherboard benchmarks, and videocard benchmarks. And tell me, how else do you find out about the performance of computer components? Buy each one and test them out yourself? Did I happen to mention I'm an extreme cheapskate? So, tell me, how do you find out about the performance of computer hardware? I'd say there's two possibilities:
1:You don't know about computer performance. If I asked you if the nvidia 7600 was faster than the ATI x850, you'd have no idea. (and don't go look it up and post it. Almost anyone could do that)
2: You read reviews of hardware online.
There's really no middle ground. Unless you have the finances of Bill Gates, or some generous sponsors, there's really no other good way.
Arcane WIzard wrote:
Writing a complicated backup program is not hardware related stuff.
So why was your amazing hardware skill an argument to bring forward? And why don't you accept that automated smtp or ftp accounts are a better and cheaper alternative from someone who does know about software?
Arcane WIzard wrote:Obviously, with all the ability you've shown. Like paying for an online backup method, being unable to argue against alternatives like freely automated smtp accounts, showing nothing but inexperience and ineptitude in subjects concerning information technology and it's global market, and even being unable to be coherent in your desired use of this technology you're supporting so objectively. And your analysis' of the thread show a huge ability for reading and comprehension.
Obviously I should know you're "pretty good with computer hardware related stuff" by now.
Everything you listed there was software related stuff. So, I was trying to remind you that being good at hardware related stuff doesn't mean that I can program something to do the backups for me to hundreds of gmail accounts. I know hardware. As in, if you have x amount of money, what's the best ___ that you could get? What advantages does x brand have over y brand in a certain price range? When is their next faster product coming out? How much performance do you get from an upgrade to quadcore? How do you overclock an AMD 64? Is CAS latency more important than speed? How much faster would this hard drive be than a normal one? Is SATA II faster than SATA I?
That's hardware stuff, at least the way I define it. You seem to have confused the definition of hardware a bit.
Arcane WIzard wrote:
Also, keep in mind that I'm an extreeme cheapskate. I have mentioned this before. While buying backup hard drives is more convenient, it costs more. Also, when those hard drives fail(and chances are, they will), I'll have to get replacements. Again, more money. Compared to the super low price of Carbonite, to me it's simple.
No, the difference is you already paid Carbonite and don't want to be wrong now. Which you are as has obviously been shown by the mere possibility of automated smtp or ftp account use, and the fact that Carbonite's harddrives are just as likely to fail meaning higher costs from lack of control or access to them. If you really where just a cheapskate then you would've accepted by now that free accounts are cheaper than $45 / year. But you are a cheapskate with an ego to protect.
What is this automated smtp or ftp you are talking about? Is there some site that allows you to upload files(up to 1TB) for free? Is the data secure? Will it ever be removed? Link me to the site. Like I said, show me a better alternative. If there really is something better, I'll see about canceling the carbonite service(I'll pay them their rate of $5/month(it's been less than one) for the little while I've been using it). However, all I see from you is a bunch of talk and no feasible examples(and no, I don't consider making 400gmail accounts to be feasible, for the reasons I've listed in my last post).
Arcane WIzard wrote:Ahh, but you also forget that I thoroughly enjoy a good argument.
Which this isn't.
really? I'm enjoying it.
Arcane WIzard wrote:
Going through and disproving or disagreeing with each one of your points in your post is fun.
Interestingly, you could also go through them and actually evaluate them. But there's more to it for you than that, you want to be right, not just disagree.
I'm only disagreeing with them because I don't think that what you are saying is correct. I'm listening to what you say. My disagreement is my evaluation. As far as I can see, while you have plenty of bad things to say about carbonite, you have offered no feasable alternatives, therefore I might as well stick with it.
Arcane WIzard wrote:
And I still challenge you: Is there a cheaper alternative that doesn't involve signing up for 400 gmail accounts?
I already mentioned buying a cheap harddrive, and you yourself already mentioned you wouldn't need terabytes, so that 400 doesn't apply anymore.
Let's see, 4 years of your crappy method = $180. Assuming their service stays around that long and you haven't lost your data several times by then. Hey wait a second, that'll buy you a terabyte (which you already claimed you wouldn't even need) worth of high speed harddrives that will be yours your whole life and will be directly accessible to you and won't depend on an internet connection either.
So, if I save up for 4 years, I can buy a couple hard drives, and back up my data. Which will fail at some point, requiring me to buy more(and again, and again). In fact, while I'm saving up for 4 years, my current hard drives could fail, making waiting 4 years for a backup useless. Also, how do you get to a terabyte for $180? The terabyte hard drive cost $650. And also, I have a bit over a terabyte. (2x 160gb + 300gb + 400gb = 1020gb.) And don't forget that many hard drives do not store what they say. For example, if you read the fine print on the box, they say that they consider a gb to be 1000 mb. So, even if I got a terabyte of storage and threw away the extra 20gb I have, I'd still be quite a bit short on back up space.
Arcane WIzard wrote:
In fact, I'd say there's a far higher chance of google shutting down those accounts than my Cable company shutting off my cable internet service becuase I used it a lot.
Hey, I know, don't use google for all 400 of them. Or, don't even use smtp for all 400. Spread it over a couple of free ftp accounts. Hell, buy a couple of <$10 webhosts for less than 45 a year total and you'll have a dozen times the service at a lower price.
Really? I just looked around on google and didn't see anything that would give me storage for cheaper than carbonite. But, as I've stated, this is not my speciality. Please link to a hosting company that I could use for this.
And you know, it would be somewhat difficult to restore files if you have the contents of your hard drive spread out among a huge series of 10mb split archive files over hundreds of email accounts, or whatever. I'm still open to it, but I'd need quite a program to automate this backup and restoring, and I certainly have no idea how to program it.