Posted: Mon 04 Dec, 2006 8:25 pm
$0.50 for the subscription ... and $0.79 (or whatever) for the paypal fee. Not going to work.
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon 04 Dec, 2006 10:00 pm
there is no fee if you have more than $100 afaik.
Posted: Tue 05 Dec, 2006 12:32 pm
Well i cant say that ive ever clicked a google ad, im not sure how successful they are. Oh well, if it helps pay for the hosting, all the better.
Posted: Wed 06 Dec, 2006 12:19 pm
Why 50 cents? A couple of $$$ would work much better. : Pkv83 wrote:I think so too. It would generate a lot of money for ticalc.org if they only let you upload screenshots (for example) if you have a "gold" account (which costs about $0.50 a year or something)
Would increase money and decrease bandwith
Posted: Wed 06 Dec, 2006 12:52 pm
I don't know. I guess everything higher than $2 wouldn't work that well and propably wouldn't feel like it's "worth" the couple of screenshots.Arcane WIzard wrote:Why 50 cents? A couple of $$$ would work much better. : Pkv83 wrote:I think so too. It would generate a lot of money for ticalc.org if they only let you upload screenshots (for example) if you have a "gold" account (which costs about $0.50 a year or something)
Would increase money and decrease bandwith
Posted: Wed 06 Dec, 2006 1:32 pm
premium services are pretty cool, but not for something trivial as screenshots..
Posted: Wed 06 Dec, 2006 4:05 pm
Oh I thought you where referring to an already existing premium account service with more functionality and that you where proposing it would cost 50 cents.kv83 wrote:I don't know. I guess everything higher than $2 wouldn't work that well and propably wouldn't feel like it's "worth" the couple of screenshots.Arcane WIzard wrote:Why 50 cents? A couple of $$$ would work much better. : Pkv83 wrote:I think so too. It would generate a lot of money for ticalc.org if they only let you upload screenshots (for example) if you have a "gold" account (which costs about $0.50 a year or something)
Would increase money and decrease bandwith