xLIB v0.6b Testing

kalan_vod · Post by **kalan_vod** » Tue 13 Dec, 2005 7:16 pm

Yes this is true, you have a disclaimer in the read me anyways.

necro · Post by **necro** » Wed 14 Dec, 2005 1:37 am

...and he got it fixed...you should think about it this way though, if you don't make a new xlib we all will cry until we try asmebly and break our calculators anyways...except will will also break a bunch of others peoples calculators...and they will cry too...so if you don't release a new xlib youll make a buch of people cry including baby chipmuncks who are staving in etheopia because cruel children stole their nuts to make them sad so they would feel better since they broke their calculators by playing poorely coded asm games...

kalan_vod · Post by **kalan_vod** » Wed 14 Dec, 2005 4:28 am

I think you should release it Pat, it will discontinue a lot of projects if it wasn't

.

necro · Post by **necro** » Wed 14 Dec, 2005 4:42 am

yep...and think of all those chipmunks

<ON TOPIC>Well, are you going to discontinue? I would be realy sad...but I guess it is your choice.

Post by **tr1p1ea** » Wed 14 Dec, 2005 9:26 am

Hang on ... your calc is fixed now?

I guess there is nothing else i can do but release xLIB, as there seem to be a few people who are really hanging out for it.

I still have to catch a few bugs, then ill email out ok.

dragon__lance · Post by **dragon__lance** » Wed 14 Dec, 2005 9:33 pm

awesome

could i have a copy to?

and btw, hows that bug with copying prgms from ram coming? is it possible?

necro · Post by **necro** » Thu 15 Dec, 2005 4:21 am

well, kinda off topic, but why would you want to make a copy from ram instead of executing it while it's allready there?

dysfunction · Post by **dysfunction** » Thu 15 Dec, 2005 1:08 pm

I also don't understand why it's so necessary...

billybobjones · Post by **billybobjones** » Thu 15 Dec, 2005 8:22 pm

Could I have a copy as well.
chessfreak2007@yahoo.com

dragon__lance · Post by **dragon__lance** » Thu 15 Dec, 2005 9:31 pm

necro wrote:well, kinda off topic, but why would you want to make a copy from ram instead of executing it while it's allready there?

i dunno, wassn't it Merthsofts request?

necro · Post by **necro** » Thu 15 Dec, 2005 9:45 pm

you didn't know the point but were still requesting it

dysfunction · Post by **dysfunction** » Fri 16 Dec, 2005 4:25 am

It could be useful to execute a program whose name is held in a string, but instead you could just do this:
expr("prgm"+"NAME")

katmaster · Post by **katmaster** » Fri 16 Dec, 2005 5:19 am

Ohhh, Me too, Me too!!!!!
katmaster200@yahoo.com

DarkerLine · Post by **DarkerLine** » Fri 16 Dec, 2005 9:28 pm

dysfunction wrote:It could be useful to execute a program whose name is held in a string, but instead you could just do this:
expr("prgm"+"NAME")

I wish that worked. However, expr( requires its argument to return a value (on the 83+ series, at least).

dysfunction · Post by **dysfunction** » Fri 16 Dec, 2005 11:01 pm

DarkerLine wrote:
dysfunction wrote:It could be useful to execute a program whose name is held in a string, but instead you could just do this:
expr("prgm"+"NAME")
I wish that worked. However, expr( requires its argument to return a value (on the 83+ series, at least).

Dang, you're right, I hadn't tested that.