MaxCoderz

ya i got here through desolate where it says maxcoderz.com or w/e i figgured it was juust a mistake that it wasnt com/net. i assume there will be alot of people who wouldnt check other net extensions, so i too feel alot of new members are being detered by the changed addresses before they even get ...

I would like to see you run Vista on a 400MHz P3 with 256MB ram [ and yes, WITH aero ]

Not sure why you would want to run vista anyway. It sucks just as much as OS X .

Wow, you've only made 6 posts in like 2.5 years. Anyway, what do your programs have to do with an rpg?

threefingeredguy wrote:I'm more looking forward to Final Fantasy Chrystal Chronicles.
I'm still playing the new Strikers at every chance though, it's ridiculously awesome.

What are the Final Fantasy games about, anyway? I've been wondering for a while.

threefingeredguy wrote:"Badder"

I was joking.
Also, "Not-TI" and "Not-Game" should be changed to "Non-TI" and "Non-Game".

Even though it's been about 2.5 years, I thought I should point out that "more easier" should just be "easier". We don't to give n00b's a badder example, now, do we?

So, then, I like magicdanw's suggestion of making an option for "old" xLIB and "new" xLIB (ie. real( xLIB and imag( xLIB). I wouldn't make it int, that's used too much, hell, imag( and real( have some pretty practical uses sometimes too... Yes, I like his idea too, but as for us...

If I recall, xLIB did chain properly with Omnicalc, and the problem was just that it used the same function numbers as Symbolic.

It uses the same numbers as Omnicalc as well.

Just tried it with the new version and it works

There's no reason for all of Omnicalc's other options to be forcibly disabled. Hmm.. :? . It's actually been awhile since I even tried installing both, and that was when I used TI-OS v2.41, which had about 3 million bugs, so the ram clears and all that other crap may have just been TI's fault :lol:...

I think backwards compatibility is more useful to people than breaking it just for omnicalc. But Omnicalc and Symbolic are the only apps that seem to have a big problem with it :? . Besides, the only people who need it to run at the same time are programmers. I might be able to make a 'run omnicalc...

What if you and Michael found a way for the apps to chain like symbolic and omnicalc (which I know is just about imposible ) do, and then made a special version that used different tokens. That way, the all previous programs would not have to change their format.

:cry: Why, oh why did you have to make xlib use real(00 through real(30 ? Whenever I run something that uses xlib, first I have to disable both Omnicalc and Symbolic, which makes Pretty Print just about worthless. I love those apps since I only do Basic programming. Without Omnicalc I can't restore ...