Page 85 of 91

Posted: Tue 31 Oct, 2006 7:55 pm
by Timendus
Wow... CoBB, you're amazing :)
What a waste of effort on my behalf :mrgreen:

Posted: Wed 01 Nov, 2006 1:13 am
by tr1p1ea
My goodness, you had better be grateful! Hehe this is already the best emulator there is and with these kinds of features packed in, no-one would dare challenge!

Posted: Wed 01 Nov, 2006 5:59 am
by DigiTan
CoBB wrote:Added linking history graph.
(Stammering)

(Falls down anime-style)

Posted: Wed 01 Nov, 2006 7:07 pm
by KermMartian
CoBB: Any chance you'll fix the bug in the memory viewer where you have to press an arrow key after a Goto... address change to make the view change to the new address? Nothing major, just thought I'd mention it.

Posted: Wed 01 Nov, 2006 10:35 pm
by CoBB
I would, but it never happens to me...

Posted: Thu 02 Nov, 2006 3:23 am
by KermMartian
O.o Seriously? Am I the first person to mention it then? It's happened on every Windows XP computer on which I've used PTI.

Posted: Thu 02 Nov, 2006 7:18 am
by CoBB
I can only test it under XP and Wine, and both behave correctly for me.

Posted: Thu 02 Nov, 2006 11:55 am
by Timendus
Hmm, I noticed the same thing in Wine recently, I think... can't confirm though.

Posted: Sun 05 Nov, 2006 8:00 pm
by King Harold
didn't notice that.. But I DID notice that the buttons on the pindurTI debugger respond to right-clicking aswell, well the emulated TI responds to it, the buttons doesnt looks pushed. Nothing major.. just odd.

Posted: Sun 05 Nov, 2006 10:13 pm
by CoBB
King Harold wrote:didn't notice that.. But I DID notice that the buttons on the pindurTI debugger respond to right-clicking aswell, well the emulated TI responds to it, the buttons doesnt looks pushed. Nothing major.. just odd.
What buttons are you talking about? You mean the slot selection? Note that the primary function of the left button is to press the on key, and I thought it’s reasonable to also switch to the calc in question. The right key can be used to switch without interfering with the calc in any way. That’s documented behaviour.

I uploaded a preliminary theme-supporting version, which means that the debugger window doesn’t look like total crap when you have a fancy theme enabled. ;) Since this feature is still buggy and untested, I didn’t use the normal link. Get it here:

http://users.hszk.bme.hu/~pg429/pindurt ... themed.exe

Note that it doesn’t work well with the ‘classic’ theme, and that’s something I’ll obviously fix. But if you can observe any other quirks, please let me know. And the changelog:
10:33 2006.11.05.
Handling more tokens.
Double clicking an item in the variable list jumps to its address in the memory view.
0:37 2006.11.05.
Improved variable names.
15:00 2006.11.04.
Screen size limit removed.
0:37 2006.11.04.
Switched to listview in the VAT component.
19:46 2006.11.02.
Preliminary theme support for XP.

Posted: Mon 06 Nov, 2006 2:33 am
by tr1p1ea
Im running out of ways to say how much PindurTI continues to impress. It makes calc development so much easier. The variables list is a nice touch.

Posted: Mon 06 Nov, 2006 6:25 am
by CoBB
tr1p1ea wrote:Im running out of ways to say how much PindurTI continues to impress. It makes calc development so much easier. The variables list is a nice touch.
So it didn’t crash on you. Good to hear. :)

Posted: Mon 06 Nov, 2006 9:26 am
by Spencer
This is specific to your newest release.

In the debugger, if you remove all of the panes from a ||| or ==, then delete one more, you consistently get a crash.

For all releases: if you remove all panes, there is no way to add any back. Changes are not saved after exiting pti.

We appreciate your work so far. Obviously nobody could've created such a fine foundation for an emulator as you have. However, in many ways our priorities are very different -- e.g. I'd prefer a stack trace instead of a link history, or memory i/o records instead of "hub" support. How about a source release?

Posted: Mon 06 Nov, 2006 9:35 am
by Jim e
Yea that first crash happens with me to.

I have to agree though, although I know the linking emulation and history would be an absolute life saver when ever a I needed to do linking. I really don't see it as priority over things like stack trace and more break points.

Plus those four screen take up a lot of screen real estate.

Posted: Mon 06 Nov, 2006 9:36 am
by kv83
How about a source release?
Oh please not. That way you get multiple different releases from different people. This project is "to small" to be worked on by more than one person. I say; first finish it than release the source