MaxCoderz

Ah, so THAT's what happened to all the good topics... They're not entirely broken, but the post count mismatches because it's removed all your posts, so you have to click a page earlier. Damned, that's pretty fucked up :? Well, there were some nice SQL errors yesterday, so I guess something's gone p...

Okay, thanks! Should have figured that out myself

You can think of the carry flag from the ADD instruction as being the 9th bit of the result. When you do the ADC, you are carrying-over that bit into the high byte. Yes, that's what I thought. but I never like to say "this will work" without actually running the code ;) Edit: Though a sma...

driesguldolf wrote:I won't be that active for a while... I'll get back into Vera begin February...

And you expect me to read that here?!
Oh wait, it just worked... damned!

E-mail would be a better idea for these kinds of announcements

That looks real nice, thanks qarnos!

And doing a smaller add de,bc, would that be something like this? Just thinking out loud here, no idea if it'll work

Oh, replace
ld d,h \ ld e,l
in my example and
ld h,d \ ld l,e
in your example with
ex de,hl



Either way, the question still stands.

That's nice and all, but hl is holding a pointer for me, so I'd still have to push it.

Same question for add de,bc... there's got to be much faster ways then ?

I want to compare two 16-bit registers, and see which one's value is largest. Something like: cp de,bc jp c,bcIsBigger Of course cp doesn't work with these registers, but neither does sbc (which, I believe, also properly sets the carry flag), and I'd prefer not to use hl. I could start moving data a...

I've added a new page on WikiTi getting people started with emulators and assemblers, for new assembly programmers:
http://wikiti.denglend.net/index.php?title=Beginners

I've been so bold as to write a Beginners Manual on the WikiTi:
http://wikiti.denglend.net/index.php?title=Beginners

I suggest we put some energy into perfecting that page and point new people to it, instead of discussing assemblers and emulators every single time.

CoBB, PindurTI is losing in popularity against WabbitEmu... :( I'll hack it as a second backend into my new Linux frontend for WabbitEmu, so I don't give either project an advantage, but if PTI wants to survive you really need a nice GUI soon :P (And preferably a Linux binary with working LCD too ;)...

benryves wrote:Exception is spelled, well, exception. Only one of the new exception types was spelled correctly (all the others were spelled "Expection"). Cheers to gameprograma for spotting this!

Thank God, proof that Ben is still human!

Aren't you people amazingly funny...

That's exactely what I was thinking... If the problem you're trying to catch is accidentally executing random data, then an interrupt isn't going to help you. You'd have executed at least a few thousand malformed "instructions" before it gets detected. Also, it doesn't prevent applications...

Exactly, you can break programs if they get stuck, but it still doesn't prevent them from screwing up the RAM, which can also crash your calculator. Any ideas on how we can prevent that, apart from working with different hardware? ;) Not that such a feature isn't useless, of course! I suppose you me...